HomeSearch for 'mothers'

mothers - Baby-sitting & Childcare

In Germany the women who give up their gender role, are called “Raven Mothers”?

Posted in Working Mothers on 9th December 2013

in Germany women who are their gender roles as “raven mothers” give up?
“Bad mother” or raven mother is a bad mother and a wife that works. This kind of women very much on in Germany frowned. Therefore, it is not surprse that Germany is the leading economy in Europe and a manufacturing powerhouse, while Sweden and other Scandinavian countries are feminist become very stagnant and much smaller economies. Women in Germany know their job is to be with the children, and the system works very well and the results speak for themselves. Feminists have only on the success of Germany to see that their way of doing things is total garbage and not more than one female fantasy of equality. Germany is proof that feminism is total nonsense. “A credible estimate, says the Institute for Economic Research no more than 2.2% of management jobs in the largest German companies are held by women. This prompted the country’s labor minister Ursula von der Leyen, propose the odds, the reservation 30% of leadership positions for Frauen.Deutsch business associations agreed to the Idee.Sie that improvements are necessary, but said that the imposition of the rule would make the German economy less competitive. My argument is that the companies to force posts to people who would not otherwise choose to give, is to allow them to choose a less suitable person. “ 12703897Definition Rabbenmutter – A loveless, heartless, cruel, unnatural, or indifferent mother, a bad mother, taking good care of their children will not be considered @ Grandma Tee -., this “cost” of human rights seems to be a great success, people all over the world is. Not only that, but in many other countries in the German economy in search of a model on the pattern itself including the UK @ Sam Padmore. – If you are using feminist criteria to assess the quality of life, then obviously gain the most feminist countries would. Look at the size of the economies for a more accurate picture. Germany dominated Sweeden in almost every category that really counts. The participation of women apparently they will not ever again actually holds it seems Germany all other forward past in Europe antreiben.Ranny @ Tea – Germany recognizes that the feminist woman, is a grotesque and terrible twisted shape of the woman. Any woman who shy away from their children and not to stay at home to care for them and the evil self centered, cruel and unnatural. Gender is important when a lot of time with children to consider as the role of women predominantly. As for custody, women who should not be considered custody to find himself in such a position as they will be proven unfit @ Grandma Tee -. These women are clearly not suppressed as they benefit from the largest economy in the world. Men free in their natural female roles, and constantly bending backwards without interference, so as not thrive women earn a work space that they give and have past any other economy in the world away. The world can not get enough of products manufactured in Germany. Women benefit from this diversification. They are certainly not suppressed. Especially for the large number of German tourists in London, where one to indicate how oppressed the women live. They appear with a lot of fun for me Best Answer (s):.

by Granny Tea answer
It sounds used as a shaming tactic to gender roles that they zwingen.Denken otherwise not selected females, this is a good idea? ? Choosing what you think is better for business at the expense of human rights Forcing someone into a gender role that limits their personal potential, is a form of oppression, whether by law or by social Druck.Edit: set equal to your original definition of this term with women who work … Therefore, labeling women as loveless work, heartless, cruel, unnatural, callous and a bad mother who does not take care of their Kinder.Heißt that mean that men who work, are just as bad by parents? Why should those gender matter when it comes to the time with which children. If work makes women bad mothers, then working fathers are also bad … unless you’re suggesting that the children need their mother and care love much more than that of their fathers. If yes, then could explain why so many choose male judges to give women the sole custody of their children after a divorce. Am I to assume you agree with such a judgment, the Edit custody: A success for whom? Definitely not for the people whose rights will be affected. You have not really written proof of this assertion anyway. Even if it is true, a better economy is never a good excuse to suppress 50% Bevölkerung.Kein doubt that the U.S. would have a better economy if they never released the slaves. Why not slavery back on the list of options, if you think this kind of questionable “economic” strategy is perfectly fine Edit: you’re not using logic. You support all your arguments on cultural assumptions and emotionality. Use logic next time, so there is actually something for me to give a rebuttal. Nothing you just said, is based on data or facts … only sexist cultural bias based. Give it another shot and usage data this time please. Is it very difficult to make a logical discussion with someone who only uses emotions, cultural prejudices and opinion their evidence to haben.Edit: You always do not have any links to your evidence, but simply on more and more unsupported Forderungen.Ja, everyone whose potential is bounded and decisions with which they were born on the basis of the genitals, and is not suppressed and unfairly treated specially away gemacht.http :/ / / oppressedFalls on their individual skills and abilities, these women opted for a more traditional way of life to live without shamed and forced into it, then it would not be suppression … but from what you showed is not so.Edit: Call me progressive, but I tend to put human rights on the economy.

Answer by Sam Padmore
So you are telling me that a country like Sweden, which is extremely high in relation to the quality of life on place is worse than a country like Saudi Arabia, where women have no rights at all? Germany has a lot of female rights. What falls dir.Edit: In answer to your question, in what universe does not exist in Germany have the rights of women? I feel that you have something set, German Grannies say, plucked and that is now all the data that you need to claim that Germany does not support female rights. Germany is very accommodating for working women, in fact, it is my intention to transfer it in a few years. You can with the worst example, a backup copy of your claim. I’m actually surprised that I did. So much effort into answering your question, if you clear either’ll find a massive troll or an idiot

Reply Άriεѕƒląrε ¨ * •. ❤. • * ¨
on his forehead furrowed? If there frowning are mainly men on these women, then …. I do not think these women care.

Answer by Erwin
As more women will put in the work force as an improvement? Germany is doing well now. I as an engineer would like to have a job in Germany as an economic power house produce “real” goods feminized not like other countries that only offer service goods then decided to bomb other countries if they lack resources sind.Wer should punish proposed gender quotas with death sentence @ tea:. When Women loyal get their natural roles, then I agree, women should then the standard guardian is. But the kind of women seldom ask for divorce ein.Es male roles is to be the breadwinner, so it does not make him a bad father when he decided to work. This is the gender roles of nature, not design determines up to you! Slavery has nothing to do with the stability of the family unit. Nice try with your style of feminist argument aber.Wie it is not logical when women born with the womb and breast, therefore they should be the ones to maintain?, You are the one who. Emotional arguments They speak only based on selfish female Gier.Haha, so equating Women as natural mothers natural instinct of murder? They are really verloren.Medizin is a good “unnatural” scientific progress, but it can have side effects. Same applies to nuclear technology. But feminism? What offers? Brainwashed products as you, broken families, loose morals, messed up justice. The same applies, Communism, Communism is not natural and only good at destroying Ländern.Ihre “human rights” can only in the first World countries be maintained at the expense of others. Feminized Nations has become part commy and it is time that their economies to crash. Then, it will be back to old lovin Patriarchate again. I’ll be there for you 🙂 Request a brainwashing is not a personal attack, it’s a fact! , I’m brainwashed by scientific evidence of Gehirnwäsche.Dann blindly loyal to your idea that women equal to men it is “logical”! Who are you to define logical? I refer my logic to nature. Your logic you are referring to how women should CEOs and astronauts with the help of welfares and Odds “The presence of a uterus and breasts is not that a woman somehow limited with childcare skills.” – I’m not saying that women are limited, but Women should not have to give by feminism brainwashed undergo humanity can support a few CEOs of women, but if we all women leave their natural tendency, then we have a problem. Women can be anything they want, just remember its natural role as a carer. Men are built and specialized to be bread winners, it is a biological lottery, cry me a river if you do not mögen.Die nation that was very you live just developed and concreted by a patriarchal society. U.S. founding fathers were all men, they return to their homes, their wives, who were to submit completely to their natural tendency. Companies in the past exist only because of patriarchy. Your argument is invalid. They are occupying your argument straw picking countries that wird.http devastated by wars and lack of modernity :/ / feminism is genocide of Dr. Will Pierce. That sums up my point of view video. No Feminists have no logical ability to understand its excellent, clear view. I wish you good luck, if you like to do without your feminine ego to be played on this video educate ist.Chancengleichheit has by nature since the time of the first Amoebas ever appear on this planet. As I said, it is a biological lottery. Women are born to be nurses. Just so happens that the Modern women can be free, but is it worth to break it to gender harmony for this exemption? Looks to me the answer is yes for you, but not for mich.Gengkhis Khan would not be able to conquer all of Mongolia when he werden.Dann serviced 50% of its armies, are held by women not just to prove your point force correlation, it shows your desperation. , Japan is a patriarchal nation (they even make video games about rape and nobody can say anything) and it is one of the most advanced countries in the Welt.Frauen is key for the advancement or the extermination of people that ultimately the key to humanity’s destiny.

used Answer by RAWR
in other words, the suppression of half of the population, make the other half rich? I mean, already found feminists that this as the purpose of oppression female, a long time before you do not, bro.

Answer by John
Very poorly informed.

Answer by Lili
Ah yes, the old Nazi kids, Kitchen, paradigm KircheUnd Germany it was so good, right? To the extent that the country werden.Als built by the United States after the war more than a historian of World War II found the Allies made any use of their power woman, the spiritual and work posts, the women were making, but not the Germans. And this contributed to their Zerstörung.Du seem to be forgotten, that in Germany Chancellor is female, that they are a former Wissenschaftler.Sie not very bright, or Edit: BTW, in our distant past, families, extended clans and tribes supported on the labor contributions of both sexes or species could not have survived. Men had more upper body strength and was therefore better hunters, but when game was scarce, as it was often women who are fed up with their family gathering professions, called for the sharp observation among others. So it was probably a woman who found out that people could cultivate plants that could be managed, which in turn led to the creation of communities settled, urban development, technical work, reading and writing, and a whole series of recognized aspects of civilized life. We all would not be here if it not only to keep going not the way women employed their talents the species, but in place the foundations of civilization set gewesen.Angela Merkel would certainly agree.

Light green answer
Cool name, shame that it uses an insult wird.Was is so wrong with working mother, especially when he is no longer the family, homeless or go without food or heating. The cost of living in the UK is incredibly high, and need to work on the mother, or are extremely bad and go or bases without Schulden.Ha ha, you mention get men to their natural roles, of course, for women who do not working, says work. They are so out of tune with the rest of the western world.

are response of Pi ¨ ¨ 03
Working mothers neither bad mother called in German, they are still frowned upon. Many, if not most women work nowadays. A “bad mother” is a mother who does not really work caring for their children, which goes all night clubbing or things. Not a woman who has to work their children have a good future.

If one is to stay at home work so hard, why can not Republicans support welfare for single mothers?

Posted in Working Mothers on 2nd November 2013

If a stay at home mom is hard work, then why not Republicans support welfare for single mothers?
“.? Attacking Democrats How dare rich stay at home moms Now we can claim to cut spending on poor mothers’ Best Answer (s):

Reply Me First
We support them …. We do not support lifetime welfare for the disabled Körper.Was part of it you do not understand?

Reply by Texas Patriot
Mmmm, what are you talking about Republicans. Please provide a source to back up your claims.

response from beren
It’s just hard work if you are rich. If you are poor, it means you are lazy.

Reply thepewterguy We would not need welfare for mothers when their fathers had a job … But we can not sending 400,000 jobs per week over seas for two decades and expect to work there for the fathers … Can we?? Tell that to the Federal politicians that use two decades later Pushing “FREE” to slave labor “TRADE” to replace American jobs are “duty-free import …” They do not care what you / we do, because they in Communist China and like-minded countries to a job in the companies that are selling American jobs to invest time and tell the hundreds of billions from the labor differentials alone … Our government is bought and paid BY …… GREED …. These are Obama’s Department of Labor figures published every Thursday and can be found on Fox and Friends by 8.45 bis 09.00 clock clock. See it for yourself if you want to be released only with the raw numbers from the DOL … You will not hear them on another network … I wonder why? Figures published every Thursday for the loss of work for the week zurück.2/19/2012 … 348,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit2/26/2012 … 350,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit3/01/2012 … 351,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit3/08/2012 … 361,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit3/15/2012 … 351,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit3/22/2012 … 348,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit3/29/2012 … 359,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit2012.04.05 … 357,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit4/12/2012 … 380,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit4/19/2012 … 386,000 New ArbeitslosigkeitInsgesamt signatory ………. 3,591,000 New signatories Arbeitslosigkeit.Das is lost “only” in the last 10 Wochen.Wie have many new signatory their jobs feel Obama’s election? Has 170 weeks of the term as POTUS Obama has America’s new signatories unemployment averaged about 400,000 jobs per week. 3 years + The average number of signatories is now at New … 68.923 million Americans who have lost their jobs haben.Ich a question for you … Is it time to wake up yet? Your voice on 6 November 2012 to answer this question. § † † § FNSʎɹǝʌɐ sɥʇıʍǝʇǝdɯoɔuɐɔsǝʌɐ ן ן ן uo sʎ

Reply by So easy, a democrat could do it!
show ….. That’s why we support the concept of two-parent households. Some prostitutes who got knocked up because she was too stupid to take a pill to not laze all day to earn my expense.

answer of How would I know,
Let me help you heal some of your stupidity .. There is a difference between mothers who stay at home and raise their children, not by the taxpayers to do it, and those who have kids popping and then expect the taxpayer to pay to raise them.

Reply by Peace through blinding force
Here is a simple contrast that literally 100% of the non-retarded OBVIOUS find:> Democrats CELEBRATE with more people on welfare, which of course is EXACTLY the same “more people need social assistance.”> Republican DELIVER leaving more resources for people to prosperity and all the Democrats that hate.

answer of Socrates
your argument does not make sense. Apparently you what made money from the government, it is what you think they should do.

Reply by Bad Wolf
I have to pay my own children. I can not afford to pay for someone else’s

response from Chris
Because when a conservative woman is a single mother she does not need me, and yes, there is a way conservative woman can be a single mother.

Are you agree with Ann Coulter Single Mothers

Posted in Working Mothers on 28th March 2013

you agree with Ann Coulter about single mothers?
She said: “It’s a disaster for the children I mean, of course, some of them can be overcome, but now we have 30, 40 years of data on this subject Eighty percent of prison inmates were raised by single mothers on the 70th… . percent of teenage runaways, juvenile delinquents and the girls get pregnant out of wedlock who were raised by single mothers “ Best Answer (s):

response from Ralfcoder
Ann Coulter seems to me as someone who is a fact never get in the way of an opinion, especially if it is their own war.Ich think if people to ignore them, they will last so full of their own bile and explodieren.Edit: I welcome GT man for his achievements. I was also raised by a divorced mother – along with 3 other siblings. Dad was in the picture, but we saw him once every other weekend, and the support was not always there. Not always his fault his situation was so-so at times. But I went to college (and paid for it myself), and now live a comfortable married life. My 25th Birthday with my first and only wife is coming. We have a son who is finishing his first year of college ist.Mein point in all of this to say that a bad start in life, not the demise anyone. And it’s not even work hard to overcome a start like this. What is needed is constant work for the long-term direction of the goal. Stay in school. Go to college to study for a good career, and finish the syllabus. Find a decent job – hell, no job, and move as you can and when you can. DON “T’re married one parent to you and ready for them to be, and not a dozen children. It is not impossible to make a decent middle-class life in this way without knocking himself out. And to pay if you want the first 20 years your life, you could knock it off by itself, and a millionaire entrepreneur, if you be careful how you do it können.Aber when Ann Coulter always comes to me and holds me as a figurehead, as you succeed in America, you better not in public, or they will get a shock when I tell her that I can do nothing with it.

response from johnb693 I would
not agree with Ann Coulter is she told me the sun came in the morning, and goes to the Nacht.Aber they may be right on this issue. It is not easy, the kids, even with two loving parents. And so much more difficult if it is a single mother ist.Wir all know, women get paid less than men and have more issues than men, even more so when a child erziehen.Was we should look for, is for the most part, where are the fathers of these children, and why they are not involved, if not in their child’s life, at least for the cost of their upkeep.

response from gt you Although statistics show
that as almost fact, I still disagree sein.Im a product of a broken home, and I am very successful both financially and emotionally (we lived near poverty so no, nothing was handed to me) I am also a single father, and I know in my heart that my son will turn out just fine.Oft (I realize not always tell) people use the excuse that they are a single mother, to be lazy and not instead of in their discipline and intensify while the job that they often fought so hard in court sind.PS johnb visit me sometime, I’ll introduce you to 6 other single fathers except me, mothers, deadbeats we are fathers (one cent support not say, child support that is) deny wrong, we simply take pride to make it myself. I will also be a ton of women, to facilitate the work when I came and paid more than I can get just to meet a quota, have recourse single white men NOTHING when getting a job, except our ability to do the job themselves tun.Und What planet are you living on where women live more spending? My life and then try to repeat your AussagenUnd Arella I’ve got enough on my plate to increase my child a lot of time lends a hand, other with their children

response from Arella Yonteff
It takes a whole village to educate a child, and no one is lending a hand more . A single mother raises her children to the best of their abilities, and no one bothers to ask where is the father. Mrs. Coulter is so blind. In her case, the concept of “think before you speak” would be really handy.

response from Mquin357 come
Some people are famous because they come up with new and interesting ideas … some are famous because they twist facts and take them some sick adapt agenda. Ann Coulter is the letztere.Ja, increased by one loving parent is not usually as good as the loving parents of two educated. This is a fact. However, their numbers wrong and gerissen.Crime out of context and parenting are related , but there is no evidence that we take the parents to blame for the actions of their children as adults, children who run away … mostly come from abusive homes -. there is a link between abuse and parenting … but the blame alone mothers … come on .. who like to blame ice is the sole reason why Western nations (not just America – even in Europe) are always dicker.Schließlich many people want a simple solution … no children outside the marriage. Great idea … not divorced … again get a great idea. But the truth is that there is limited willingness to actually tackle America’s problems with sexuality. 40% want free love, and only 40% want missionary married sex and only about 20% can even be said that America has the highest teen pregnancy rate of any modern western culture! Why?